Real-Time BNB Signal Analytics
Alright, let's talk about Anthropic. Everyone's buzzing about their supposed $183 billion valuation. But before we start popping champagne, let’s dig into what's actually driving these numbers. Are we seeing genuine growth, or is this just a clever accounting trick by Alphabet and Amazon?
Alphabet reported a $10.7 billion gain from its stock holdings this quarter, with a significant chunk attributed to Anthropic. Amazon chimed in with a $9.5 billion pretax gain from their Anthropic investment. That’s a combined $20.2 billion boost, and it's hard to ignore. The question is, how much of this is "real" money versus unrealized gains on paper? Because there's a big difference. Alphabet (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN) See Billions in Gains From Anthropic’s AI Boom
The core issue here is how these gains are being calculated. It's not like Alphabet and Amazon sold their Anthropic stock and pocketed billions in cash. Instead, they're marking up the value of their investment based on Anthropic's rising valuation. It's a bit like saying your house is worth more because Zillow says so, even though you haven’t actually sold it yet.
Now, contrast this with Microsoft. They took a $3.1 billion hit on their OpenAI investment. Analysts estimate that OpenAI’s market value dropped by about $11.5 billion in the quarter. (Ouch.) This discrepancy—Alphabet and Amazon up, Microsoft down—highlights the volatility and, frankly, the speculative nature of these AI investments.

Here’s where things get interesting. Alphabet's Google Cloud has a deal to supply Anthropic with one million AI chips starting in 2026. That's worth tens of billions of dollars and represents over one gigawatt of computing power. Amazon, meanwhile, is building special data centers (Project Rainier) to handle Anthropic’s workload.
These aren't just passive investments; they're strategic partnerships. Alphabet and Amazon aren't just betting on Anthropic's success; they're actively enabling it by providing crucial infrastructure. This is where the line between investment and operational expenditure blurs. Are these gains truly independent of the core business, or are they intricately linked to the services these tech giants provide?
I've looked at hundreds of these filings, and this particular interplay is unusual. It suggests a symbiotic relationship where the "investment gains" are, to some extent, a reflection of the value being created within Alphabet and Amazon's own ecosystems. It's less about Anthropic's intrinsic value and more about how Anthropic benefits its parent companies.
And this is the part of the report that I find genuinely puzzling. The "valuation" seems almost circular. Big Tech invests in AI, provides the infrastructure for the AI to grow, and then books massive gains because the AI's "valuation" increases. It's like printing money, except instead of the Fed, it's the CFO's office.
The numbers don't lie, but they don't always tell the whole truth either. Anthropic's $183 billion valuation is less a reflection of its standalone performance and more a testament to the accounting gymnastics of its big tech backers. It's a paper gain propped up by strategic partnerships and internal infrastructure deals. Until Anthropic proves it can generate real, independent revenue, that valuation remains a mirage.